American Realism in the Russo-Ukrainian War with Rebeccah Heinrichs - on Midrats
define your terms
What path best enhances American security and prosperity, along with her allies, when it comes to the Russo-Ukrainian War?
Are American's interests best promoted by more support of Ukraine's ongoing fight for her independence, or by backing away to let things take their natural course?
Isolationists, realists, and idealists are all trying to make their case as to where to go next as the war moves in to its second year.
What are their arguments, and for those who say they promote a "Realist" policy - how do they define Realism?
Out guest for the full hour this Sunday from 5 to 6pm Eastern to discuss this and related issues she raised in her latest article in National Review, "Who are the Real 'Realists' on Ukraine?" will be Rebeccah Heinrichs, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute.
Join us live if you can, but it not, you can get the show later by subscribing to the podcast. If you use iTunes, you can add Midrats to your podcast list simply by clicking the iTunes button at the main showpage - or you can just click here. You can find us on almost all your most popular podcast aggregators as well.
Ukraine was not invaded by Russia in 2014. The CIA started a coup de tat against Ukrainian democracy, resulting in an internal civil war between various factions. Crimea voted to become independent of the Soviets and they voted again to become independent of the Azov Right sector nazis controlling the government with NATO backing. A very similar situation happened to Diem and Qaddafi. The US dark state, the CIA pedos are essentially working in the shadows.
In order to support the Crimean Republic's act of independence from Ukraine, the West, and essentially the military and political threat of NATo destroying their government and civil security the way that NATO did to Serbia and Libya and Kiev's government duly elected before 2014 Maidan, Crimea requested and obtained the RUssian Federation's support and backing.
If the USA was truly supporting democracy in Ukraine, they would have supported the democratic protests and desire for autonomy and independence of the Ukrainian people. But the USA was playing a different game, as Operation Paperclip, the CIA, and FBI hinted at for a very long time now.
The reason why she thinks the Ukrainian military looks sharper is because NATO has been training 10,000 Azov to NATO infantry standards, each year, since 2014. That would be equivalent to China training 10,000 Mexicans and Canadians to fight with Chinese equipment, in preparation for a Chinese alliance with those nations, military bases, installment of nuclear weapons, and so forth.
This is a very similar situation to why people got 2020 covid and 2020 waxxine genocide wrong. It is a very difficult maze or illusion that you are being tested with. In this situation, the entirety of the information you are being fed is erroneous in part or in whole concerning these countries. This extends from and to the medical totalitarian issue and the political J6 DC gulag issue and the FBI/CIA government totalitarian censorship issue with twitter as well.
These think tanks are not working for America either.
Russian Federation relied on the Minsk 1 and 2 agreements to keep the peace between the Ukrainian factions. NATO was essentially helping to arm Kiev in suppressing a native revolt at the CIA coup de tat, Soros, and the usual WEF crowd. Very similar to Serbia or Libya or Syria, where USA armed terrorists. This is a common US dark state strategy. Create instability via arming terrorists, calling them protesters, then when the government falls or wars happen, move in with NATO bombs or armies.
Look up Soros color revolutions.
The trigger for the 2022 limited military engagement (as opposed to shock and awe Iraq, kill everything in sight), was the NATO arm up an the Kiev build up of these NATO trained troops. Trained to NATO specifications, that were ready to invade Donbass Ukraine and ethnically cleanse it. The Ukrainians had held out longer than anyone had expected, facing the combined might of Azov Kiev and NATO. But this time in 2022, facing artillery barrages on civilian targets, Donbass republics cried out to Putin for peacekeepers and aid, as they know they would not last long under the NATO invasion.
For most of the war in 2022, NATO and Kiev Azov right sector overlords were not facing the Russian military but the militia of Ukraine's Donbass republics. These would be Ukraine's version of MAGA or Qanon even. America was gleeful at the sight of Donbass tanks being destroyed, and Kiev was happy to lie to the AMericans and say these were Russian tanks being captured.
These kind of genocide shenanigans has been ongoing for some time since 2014 Maidan, the cia coup de tat led by Soros and Nuland. It is similar to arming up ISIL under Barack Hussein and then allowing the Yazidi to be genocided and captured as sex slaves. The US can say they have clean hands but they do not in truth.
It is the RUsso vs Nato war. In other wards, qabal transpedos control nato vs russia that fights the wef.