Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Aviation Sceptic's avatar

CDR Sal, you are to be praised for reminding us of the failure so we do not repeat it. Traditional military approach: Identify a problem, self asses, identify solutions, plan of action and milestones (to use the popular euphemism), and execute the required actions. To our shame, this didn't happen.

The failure of Abbey Gate is a microcosm of the twenty years of Afghanistan. The withdrawal was necessary, and with the Russian withdrawal as an object lesson of how hard it was going to be (and they could do it by land...we had to use an "air bridge!). And hard it was; it was ALWAYS going to be a mess. But in the immortal quote from the Duke: "Life is hard. It's harder when you're stupid." And stupid we were. The after action reviews and congressional hearings (is there anything less useful with regards to fixing a problem?) were exercises in finger pointing and blame shifting. Self assessment? Not observed. Last senior officer I can recall who resigned in protest over a civilian decision was General Fogelman in 1997. No one took responsibility for Abbey Gate, the decision to abandon Bagram, the decision to PULL THE MILITARY OUT BEFORE THE EMBASSY PERSONNEL, on and on ad infinitum. No one resigned; I think some got promoted. Accountability and responsibility are apparently no longer in our professional vocabulary.

Expand full comment
Pete's avatar

Few Americans care or remember.

The loss of those Marines means no more to most Americans than a weekend shooting spree in Chicago. They are unable to draw any connection between the defeat in Afghanistan and the wars in Ukraine, Gaza and Yemen.

The media is no more interested in Kabul than they are in Jeffrey Epstein's "suicide" or the useless and counterproductive mask mandates. And woe unto anyone who questions the official narrative.

The only reason the media would ever care about Afghanistan if it somehow affected voter turnout in Michigan or New Jersey.

America became an unserious Tik Tok nation and ill-suited to being a world power.

Expand full comment
95 more comments...

No posts