Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Conner's avatar

Wouldn't it have been nice to see a statement like "Sorry, it turned out the Sioux City was, in fact, a Little Crappy Ship. We didn't mean to offend the good people of Sioux City, and we hoped it would work out, but it didn't. The persons responsible have been sacked."

Expand full comment
mani malagón's avatar

"The alarms were going off well in to the mid-00s - and anyone who raised those alarms were crushed, marginalized, or dismissed as uninformed cranks. As each predictable problem manifested itself over the following ~2 decades, the response was to release some excuse, denial, or farcical spot-welded patch - it did not matter."

I objected to the Little Crappy Ships back in 2004 on several grounds, but the main one was strategic/philosophic:

The LCS might be appropriate for the Army, with its fleet of littoral ships and transports, but the USN is a blue water navy.

As a submariner I could hear snickering from other communities that felt that the Little Crappy Ship would fulfill their mission specs, but it all really boiled down to this issue: not understanding that power projection with Little Crappy Ships ended at Lepanto.

Expand full comment
183 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?