Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gman79's avatar

Ahh, Palau. Truly a tropical garden spot. Years ago we used to fly the EOD teams and the Seabees to Palau. The EOD guys were still cleaning up Japanese ordnance from WWII since it had been a major re-supply point, and the week before a Palau fisherman was blown to bits hauling in a Japanese mine. The Seabees would build roads, post office, schools, clinics and the people LOVED to see them getting off the plane. We had a cocktail party one afternoon at a government official's residence and one of the EOD guys was walking the grounds and came back for a conversation with his LT that went something like "Hey LT, no alarm but we gotta UXO over in the garden by the trellis, looks like a couple of Type 00's HE. No alarm?? So we aviators grabbed our drinks and headed for the door.

I'm betting that not 5% of the elitist idiots in the WH could find Palau on a globe. We need to get our foot firmly wedged in that door.

Expand full comment
campbell's avatar

okay, CDR, I'll bite.........re: Palau. (and vast reach of Pacific islands in general). Most readers here know my own horse that I plug; fine. A bit about that..... years ago, the Federated States of Micronesia expressed interest in developing airships as an addition or alternative to using marine vessels for inter-island transport. They recognized then, that there could be immense advantages in doing so.

Those advantages have only increased with time; the time that is running out on peace in the Pacific.

A simple suggestion then......that the Navy begin to seriously consider using modern, amphibious, rigid-hulled AIRSHIPS. With all the concerns over getting more ships into the fleet vis a vis the "west of Wake" hazards we are looking at...........getting more "ships", that have hulls OUT OF THE WATER would seem to be a fine fit.

Perhaps a kerfluffle out of Palau would be a nice foot-in-the-door politically to do the above.

Expand full comment
48 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?