The Costs of War at Sea
understanding scale
Earlier this week I had another of my conversations about what a war at sea will look like.
Not the wars at sea of living memory, where we never really faced a challenge at sea, but an actual contested environment.
We have not had to face that since WWII. The Royal Navy had a spot of bother for a few weeks in the 1980s, but that was only from the air from a much weaker opponent.
Politically and institutionally - not to mention industrially - the institutions of our nation and those of our allies are sleepwalking in to a systemic shock I am afraid they are not ready for.
Make no mistake, at some point another large war at sea will come. They always do. For every “long peace” there is a “large war.”
There will always be such a thing.
When the next war in the Pacific comes, it will be a naval and an air war, and the butcher’s bill will come shockingly fast, and in scale.
In WWII, by the time the USA joined the war of the Atlantic, the Royal Navy had pretty much caged the German navy inside the GIUK gap except for their submarines and what little long-range aviation they had left.
The big fight was in the Pacific. For every member of the Department of the Navy killed by enemy action in the Atlantic or Mediterranean Theaters, over five were killed in the Pacific and Asiatic Theater.
Using the numbers from the US Navy’s History and Heritage Command,
Remember, those are just the personnel killed by enemy action, not all causes, not injured, MIA or POW. Those aggregate totals are much larger.
David M. Kennedy has some similar numbers he summarized in The Atlantic at the end of the last century,
American war is incomplete without the sweep and strategic stakes of the war at sea, in which 104,985 American sailors and Marines were wounded, 56,683 were killed, and more than 500 U.S. naval vessels were sunk. Lest we forget.
War at sea in unforgiving.
Don’t just look at the personnel numbers. 500 U.S. naval vessels sunk. I have news for you, we have no way in 2024 to replace even a fraction of those numbers in under four years. We will have to fight with what we have, and try to force victory in the face of attrition without relief.
If you want to fight in the Western Pacific, you have to get there, stay there, and win that on ships. That has not changed. All else are supporting operations.
Ponder that and pray for peace - or at least demand action, now.
The anti-nuke/anti-defense-spending crowd is increasing the odds of a nuclear war significantly because they can't see past their own upturned noses.
I know most people find logistics boring, but ... has anybody tallied up how many American shipyards can build/repair each class of combatant vessel, tanker, and cargo ship that we currently use?
If we're standing here with our pants around our ankles, as I suspect we are, then how many shipyards/drydocks do we need to add in order to build and sustain a victorious fleet? How are we doing on fuel dumps and refineries?
Would dumping the Jones Act goose our merchant shipping fleet? What other laws need to be repealed (yes, yes, Goldwater-Nichols goes without saying) or enacted to fix our self-inflicted mess?
How are we looking for steel, rare earth elements, and critical microchips?
Are we ever going to put serious guns on our ships again? I suspect the Marines would appreciate having something heftier than 5" on call for naval gunfire support.
Is there a modern Andrew Higgins or three out there who needs to be funded and turned loose?
What a freakin' mess. We used to be a seagoing nation.