Ship inactivation, are, in a way, sad things to see.
Especially for those who served on them, these ships represent untold hours of dedication, hard work, love, sacrifice, and memories of long, boring watches and flashing rushes of adrenaline.
Each story is unique, but in aggregate they tell other, perhaps more meaningful stories about the naval service they represent, and the nation they serve.
For those focused on capability, the question should always be twofold; 1) Are we commissioning more or less of what are are decommissioning?; 2) Are we going to have more capabilities tomorrow than we have today?
For those focused on the Navy's stewardship of the taxpayer's investment in their working capital, an entering argument might be, "Are we getting as much as we can out of what we buy?"
There are a broad measure you can use as quick-look measures of both the utility of a ship, the value the Navy puts on it, and the degree of care the Navy took in its ownership.
1. Are ships lasting as long as their designed service life?
Released, naturally, the Friday before a three day weekend, go ahead and review the below for the details, but here is the quicklook from here, based on Class.
- Patrol Craft: Average age of ship, 27 years. We plan to send them to foreign military sales. They have more life left, yet we are letting them go without a direct replacement. Before you respond with, "Muh LCS..." read the whole message.
- Cruisers: Average age of ship, 30 years. This is their design life ... and considering what we did to their SPRUANCE sisters, not bad. This does leave a gaping hold in capabilities ... but this is what happens when your procurement program fails on CG(X), and slow rolls the horribly named Large Surface Combatant (LSC). Incompetency flavored with a lack of accountability bears a bitter fruit. We will simply have to work around it.
- LCS: Six years. Six frack’n years. I don’t think I need to say more.
- Amphibs: Always get your money's worth. 36 years.
- Subs: Well run programs get better than average results. 35 years.
- USNS: 38 years. Man, that's an old ship. Heck, one, T-AK 3016 was originally a Soviet ship.
UNCLASSIFIED//
ROUTINE
R 021303Z JUL 21
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC
TO NAVADMIN
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC
BT
UNCLAS Â
NAVADMIN 145/21 Â
PASS TO OFFICE CODES:
FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS//
INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//DNS//
MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/DNS/XXX/JUL// Â
SUBJ/FY22 PROJECTED SHIP INACTIVATION SCHEDULE// Â REF/A/DOC/OPNAVINST 4770.5J/20200904//
REF/B/DOC/OPNAVINST 5400.44A/20111013// Â
NARR/REF A IS GENERAL POLICY FOR THE INACTIVATION, RETIREMENT, AND DISPOSITION OF U.S. NAVAL VESSELS. REF B IS NAVY ORGANIZATION CHANGE MANUAL (NOCM) FOR SUBMITTING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE REQUESTS (OCR) TO INCLUDE SHIP DECOMMISSIONINGS OR INACTIVATIONS.//
POC/CDR JIM [redacted]/MIL/N9IS/LOC: Washington DC/TEL: 703-693-[redacted]/EMAIL: [redacted](at)us.navy.mil// Â
RMKS/1.  This message shall be read in its entirety to ensure all stakeholders in the ship inactivation process are aware of the projected retirement schedule for the upcoming fiscal year 2022 (FY22), respective responsibilities and necessary follow-up actions.  Ship retirement decisions reflected in paragraph 2 below align with the President’s Budget for 2022. This plan will be adjusted if necessary based on subsequent execution year decisions made by leadership or as required by Congressional action. Â
2. Â To facilitate fleet planning efforts to conduct decommissioning continuous maintenance availability (CMAV) or inactivation availability (INAC), the projected schedule for inactivating U.S. battle force and non-battle force naval vessels in FY22 is promulgated as follows: Â
Ship Name Proj Inactive Date   Post Inactive Status
USS TEMPEST PC 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 29 MAR Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FMS
USS TYPHOON PC 5 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 14 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FMS
USS SQUALL PC 7 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 10 APR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FMS
USS FIREBOLT PC 10 Â Â Â Â Â Â 01 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FMS
USS WHIRLWIND PC 1 Â Â Â 24 APR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â FMS
USS SAN JACINTO CG 56 Â 30 SEP 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN CG 57 Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS MONTEREY CG 61 Â Â Â Â Â Â 22 FEB 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS HUE CITY CG 66 Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS ANZIO CG 68 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS VELLA GULF CG 72 Â Â Â Â Â 18 FEB 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS PORT ROYAL CG 73 Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS FORT WORTH LCS 3 Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS CORONADO LCS 4 Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS DETROIT LCS 7 Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â OCIR
USS LITTLE ROCK LCS 9 Â Â Â Â 31 MAR 22 Â Â OCIR
USS WHIDBEY ISLAND LSD 41 Â Â 30 APR 22 Â Â OCIR
USS PROVIDENCE SSN 719 Â Â Â Â 02 DEC 21 Â Â RECYCLE
USS OKLAHOMA CITY SSN 723 Â Â 21 JUN 22 Â Â RECYCLE
USNS APACHE T-ATF 172 Â Â Â Â 30 JUN 22 Â Â DISPOSAL
USNS 1ST LT HARRY L
MARTIN T-AK 2015 Â Â Â 30 DEC 21 Â Â DISPOSAL
USNS LCPL ROY M
WHEAT T-AK 3016 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 31 DEC 21 Â Â Â DISPOSAL Â
3. Â Per reference (b), Fleet Commanders shall submit an Organizational Change Request for commissioned U.S. ships to formally notify the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) of a ships decommissioning, inactivation, or end of service. Â Submit revisions due to operational schedule changes per references (a) and (b). Â It is the responsibility of Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command and Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet in coordination with their respective TYCOM to ensure the appropriate lower echelon commands are notified of any changes in the ship inactivation schedules, as well as Integrated Warfare (OPNAV N9I) and OPNAV resource sponsor. Â
4. Â Adjustments to paragraph 2 ship inactivation's that cross the current fiscal year must be coordinated with OPNAV N9I due to Congressional requirements for execution year force structure changes that differ from what Congress authorized/appropriated and signed into law by the President. OPNAV shall promulgate changes to the inactivation fiscal year as required. Â
5. Â The ships commanding officer, masters, or Immediate Superior In Command, shall submit a final naval message (normally transmitted in conjunction with the decommissioning ceremony) announcing the ships official retirement date and include a brief history of the significant events in the life of the ship per reference (a). Â The Naval History and Heritage Command (NAVHISTHERITAGE WASHINGTON DC) and Naval Vessel Register Custodian (NVR NORFOLK VA), shall be included as INFO addresses. Â
6. Â Released by Mr. Andrew S. Haeuptle, Director, Navy Staff.// Â
BT
NNNN
A final note ... let me strap on my old Flag Sec loopy-thingy; a CNO message should NEVER have a typo, much less two.
On the copy of this message I received, I have two. 1) It identifies WHIRLWIND as "PC-1." It is PC-11. 2) It 1ST LT HARRY L MARTIN as "T-AK 2015." It is "T-AK 3015."
I know, I know, I am a typo machine ... but I am just a blogg'r pumping stuff out over b-fast and conference call.