Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John of Argghhh!'s avatar

Even as someone whose family has soldiered in our wars since Queen Anne's War, I recognize that at least since the Span-Am fracas we are a naval power, first and foremost. And while I want to tar and feather Austin and Milley, the willingness of the Admirals to ape the Austro-Hungarian Navy terrifies me. We need to maintain our RN heritage, not ape some continental power. Where are the Admirals of the Admiral's Revolt, vice the craven ghost of General Earle Wheeler.

Expand full comment
sid's avatar

"This century our Navy produced a whole parade of CNOs and VCNOs who knew this, but failed to make the argument, or to even make an honest effort to make it."

Bottom line is that "Force Design" and "Requirements" are set by the marketing departments of the Defense Contractors.

There is no discussion of Strategy, Operational Doctrine, Platform Requirements, etc., unless its couched in the context of which expensive baubles are going to get bought.

Lets look at where CNOs in recent times have ended up after the band played for them the last time:

Johnson - CEO General Dynamics

Clark - CEO Rolls Royce North America (maker of the MT-30s in the Freedom which he brought to life), Director Raytheon, Advisor Booz Allen...

Mullen - Board General Motors, Sprint Nextel, Afiniti

Roughead - Board NorthropGrumman

Greenert - Board BAE Systems

Richardson - Board Boeing, BWX Technologies

Gilday - ?

Is there any wonder why the arguments ...such as they are... made over the last decade plus have revolved solely around the stuff that was going to get bought ...And not the Why?

Expand full comment
57 more comments...

No posts