Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve White's avatar

The CDR writes: "Due to structural integrity, moment arms, survivability, and a whole host of engineering issues—you just can’t willy-nilly go about putting weapons all over the place."

<em>USS Yorktown</em>, CV-5, would like a word with you. From Wikipedia:

Yorktown departed Norfolk on 16 December (1941) for the Pacific, her secondary gun galleries studded with new Oerlikon 20 mm guns. (The ship's Gunnery Officer retained the Browning M2 .50 caliber machine guns the Oerlikons replaced, and acquired a supply of M1919A4 .30 caliber machine guns as well. The crew discovered the pintle mounts of the .30 calibers fitted neatly into cut swab handles, and the swab handles themselves fitted neatly into the hollow pipes used for the ship's safety lines. Dozens of sailors went into the unofficial antiaircraft gun business, and according to one report, "Yorktown bristled with more guns than a Mexican revolution movie."

The Order Of Battle's avatar

I have been advocating for the UK’s River class batch 2 OPV’s to be put through a lethality upgrade but fitting the MK110 57mm or the 40mm as mentioned onto the A position of the ships whilst fitting two 30mm remote Autocannons port and starboard. This would be an inexpensive way of rapidly increasing the fire power of such ships so they can aid in littoral escort missions as a posed to basically just humanitarian and law enforcement operations as is presently the case. I also agree that adding such weapons to large fleet auxiliaries should be done at pace, and by default on new units. They should not be seen as an optional requirement at this point in maritime defence policy and design.

77 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?