Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Brogley's avatar

UKR EOD have had a LOT of experience with "now what the heck is that?" as the glorious previously-red-army digs deeper and deeper in their quest for the ultimate boundary of "Of course it can still shoot/fly/go bang!" and from what I've seen from afar there are really quite a lot of UKR EOD folks. Hopefully all those years of helpfulness by NATO included supplying a few clickety-click meter gizmos for their go bags so as they initially approach, the new-guy will get to ask "Hey, boss, what's that clicking noise from this backpack?"

Expand full comment
Bill Gross's avatar

Back Ground, when Gen Haig was NATO Supreme Commander he decided the best role for his Engineer Atomic Demolition Munition Units would be a demonstration on the NATO side of the IGB if needed to show the Sovs we were ready to use nukes. FRG was brought into the planning side of things and established a minimum safe distance for device impact. This was for both personnel and building.

If the Russian war heads could be command detonated they follow same procedure. Find an area that meets certain stand off criteria. Use lowest yield device. Rig for command detonation. . . .

Problem solved back to work. (I admit I've got a lot of "IF"s).

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?