Where is the "International" in "International Order" - with Elbridge Colby
mirages
With a few exceptions on the sidelines by Japan and France, what has been clearly apparent in the last two months has been the absence of the International Community's presence in the Red Sea to enforce the International Order everyone seems to consider of utmost importance to the economic system that gives us the standard of living the globe is accustomed to?
Once again, it is the U.S. Navy that seems to be the force of choice, or the only real option to do the bare minimum to keep lawlessness at sea at bay.
Is this sustainable when we have allies closer to the threat with equally deployable assets? The U.S. and her Navy have larger concerns much closer to its core national interests that are already under resourced.
Our guest today to dive in to this and related issues is Elbridge Colby, Principal at the Marathon Initiative. Former Pentagon, 2018 National Defense Strategy player and author of Strategy of Denial.
You can listen here or below.
The "Navies of NATO" seem to exist purely as platforms to showcase new weaponry and electronics systems that will never be used to enforce freedom of the seas, or the land, for that matter. We'd be better off sending six full-masted frigates under sail and some salty Leathernecks with flintlocks and sabres.
If the US has to do it almost alone, so be it. I would rather pay higher taxes than a war that will cost the world more whether we like it or not