Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gerald Boullester's avatar

If you’re sloppy and your opponent is not, there is a good chance you’re gonna get wrecked…

Don’t be sloppy… and have a good day!

Expand full comment
Aviation Sceptic's avatar

FBF...come for the tale, stay for the comments. Having actual testimony from only one side of the battle (Sydney been lost with all hands) is tragic for the obvious loss of life but also for never being alble to answer the "what the hell happened here" questions. Forget where I originally heard / read it, but "surprise is something that occurs in the mind of a commander". The Sydney was "surprised". The "why" is something we will never know, so we can only speculate unfairly. The linked article details the prior assignment / career arc of her Captain, he was (perhaps) on his way up, and had recently been a staff officer...not sure how much time at sea he actually had, apologies for not reading more closely. BUT, another ship had been criticized for "excessive expenditure of ordinance while engaging another ship in the recent past". Using "20 - 20 hindsight" his decision to close to knife fighting range and giving away his long range gunnery advantage may well have been influenced by that "excessive expenditure of ordinance" knowledge from his staff tour, and as a rising star, he expected to go back to staff. So (unfairly speculating) he elected to close the range in the failing light. In retrospect, a bad decision. This is an unfair "big conclusion on scant data" conclusion on my part...but have to point out the USN was going thru similar wartime purge of "suitable for staff only" captains (particularly in the sub force) at that time. May they all rest in peace.

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts