60 Comments

Never discount Norskies. We are Vikings, after all!

Expand full comment
Apr 5Liked by CDR Salamander

The German navy was so badly damaged during the invasion of Norway that it was unable to play any role in the attack on France and the subsequent evacuation of Dunkirk. The sacrifices by the Norwegians made it possible for England to hold out in 1940-1 and stop Hitler from conquering the world.

Expand full comment

To be fair...most of that damage was done by the RN...it wasn't the RNoN wiping the German Destroyer fleet out at Narvik...

Expand full comment

Rule Britannia!

Expand full comment

For those who haven't seen it, this Scottish documentarian posted his YouTube video a few weeks back. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAWwW_wdXAg

Expand full comment
Apr 5·edited Apr 5Liked by CDR Salamander

A Norwegian friend once mentioned to me that as the government retreated from Oslo they had no armed guards and the Germans were in hot pursuit. They did have a local gun and hunting club who formed partisan-like bands to harass and slow down the German advance long enough for the government to escape. So old men, young recruits, and armed civilians stymied a powerful modern force. When happy hour rolls around this afternoon, have a drink in their honor.

Expand full comment

A great argument against gun control.

Expand full comment

I don't call it "gun control" anymore, but rather "citizen disarmament."

Expand full comment

Our elites call it disarming the peasants.

Expand full comment

Disarming their future victims.

Expand full comment

The Marxists prefer to call it “gun safety”.

Expand full comment

Makes sense. The Marxists will be very safe when everyone else is disarmed. Castro’s first act was to seize all private firearms.

Expand full comment

That part of the war is a blank to me but not now. Thanks for posting. Now I have to read up on the war in Norway.

Expand full comment

You may enjoy "The Heavy Water War" as well (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3280150/)

Expand full comment

If I may, I visited Norway last July/August, as I wanted to see Spitsbergen, Narvik and other places…heartily recommend it if you can afford it. The people are great. I wanted to move there…alas, obligations back home.

Expand full comment
founding

I had the privilege of visiting Oslo some years back while in command of my last ship. Wonderful people. The Norwegian Admiral there too me on a tour of the fortresses and gave me a complete narration. Really impressive!! As an aside we were there at the solstice----can remember wandering around in the daylight wondering why I was tired, then looked at my watch to realize it was 0300!

Expand full comment

Interestingly enough, two Investigative Commissions ran Eriksen through a post war wringer after he was accused of surrendering without putting up sufficient fight. Pretty amusing in the light of Kabul.

Expand full comment

It’s always easy for those not under fire to critcize those who were and who had to make a decision without perfect hindsight.

Expand full comment
founding

Yeah. Post war is the key here. Interestingly enough, Norway was desperately trying to remain neutral--or at least unattacked by Germany. As a result, Germany was running convoys of strategic good from Sweden through Norway's territorial waters. The British were mining those waters. Some really interesting actions during that period: Cossack versus Altmark ("The Navy's here") , Glowworn versus Hipper etc.

Expand full comment

Sailing past the wreck made an impression on me as a young conning officer on our DD headed to Oslo. Indeed it was a great port to visit.

Expand full comment

Sal?

Who are you calling an armoured Cruiser? The Lutzow? At the time of the battle, the Germans called her a heavy cruiser. laid down in 1929.

Expand full comment

one of the most inspirational battles in history.

Expand full comment

The full movie is on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrtZEYgcaIk. I've added it to my watchlist.

Expand full comment
Apr 5Liked by CDR Salamander

Thanks for this "rerun", Sal! One of my favorites.

As an old guy with old hardware (yes I can speak of M1903's and M1's with some familiarity) I find such history ... motivating. Off for a hike!

Expand full comment

I wouldn't hesitate to grab my Garand long before my AR.

Expand full comment

Seconded! Have both but honestly the only reason I got the AR was that all the right people/groups were telling me I couldn’t & shouldn’t have one so - as a result - I got one. An ergonomic nightmare I must say especially when compared to the beefy wood stocks of an M-1 Garand/K98/SMLE/M39; take one of those any day over the Mattel toy-like polymer construct of an AR. Heavier & better rounds too.

Expand full comment

Yes, all of us elderly vets like those old firearms, for various reasons. However, when I pick up a vintage firearm today, I have to admit they were never that heavy when I was younger.

Expand full comment

Weight helps though with the heavier recoil.

Expand full comment

Yes, indeed it does. I only weighed 135# when I qualified with the M1 and M1911, and I could handle them comfortably from any firing position. 55 years later, I just don't have the strength or the stamina. I'm not really in love with the M4 or the M9, but at least I can carry and handle them comfortably.

Expand full comment
author

At a couple of my deer stands where I cannot take a shot further than 100 yards, I will now and then take a standard issue 1943 production K98 with my hand loaded 170gr Hornady SST. It is really the only iron sited rifle I own that consistently comes up to my shoulder almost perfectly armed.

Expand full comment

The K98 is my all time fave; have an all matching 1936 model from the Mauser home factory in Oberndorf; never saw frontline action - the bolt is still factory tight. Was a World War II Vet bring back. Can nail quarters with it @ 50yrds & I’m using Turkish surplus ammo!!!

Expand full comment
founding

I really like my 1903A3---which of course is mainly a Mauser.With better sights.

Expand full comment

As an "old guy" realize the US Army and AF are coveting those "old guys" to fill the ranks of the non-recruited. As my old man USA colonel once told me "the poor guy on the other end of well-placed shot has no idea he has been nailed by a geriatric".

Expand full comment

Addendum; Another reason you might see A3's in WWII photos is that they were on the TO&E as rifle grenade launchers for most of the war.

Expand full comment

Old age and treachery....

Expand full comment

Along with the bravery, there's a lot of myth making and guilt among the Western European nations that fell to the Germans early in the war, reflected in fairly recent movies. Most countries fell to the Germans quickly and had a significant collaborationist stance until the tide of the war turned.

Expand full comment

We don't talk about the Quislings.

Expand full comment
founding

Or the SS Viking Division, I suspect. But that's OK.

Expand full comment

We need to remember those like De Gaulle who continued the fight as well as those like Petain, Darlan, and Laval who collaborated with the enemy.

Expand full comment

"Old age and treachery will always beat youth and exuberance." David Mamet

That's often the case.

Expand full comment

" A good plan today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow and just because a weapon is obsolete doesn't mean it's not effective.

Expand full comment

Wegians War!

Expand full comment

We Whiteheads are very proud of our torpedoes.

Expand full comment