150 Comments

SecDef Raytheon MIA, Deputy SecDef on the beach in Puerto Rico. The adults are back in charge! Time for another color revolution to distract from the regime's failures: https://yuribezmenov.substack.com/p/how-to-execute-a-color-revolution

Expand full comment

Good to see you here on the Front Porch, tovarisch. Welcome.

Expand full comment

If Biden is checked out most of the time and gets away with it, why not the SecDef?

Expand full comment

Why not indeed. Plenty of other bureaucrats to step in. Which ones? I gotta believe our intel chiefs knew what was up.

Expand full comment

The question is 'who's in charge'.

With Austin out, somebody (DepSecDef?) should have been placed firmly in charge.

With Biden out, nobody knows who's in charge.

With Biden at his Oval Office desk, nobody knows who's in charge,.

Expand full comment

Give Lloyd a break. Maybe he was transitioning to Lois.

The administration is big on these sorts of medical procedures and they can take time.

Anyway, I am sure Admiral Levine was there to run the show.

Expand full comment

And the world wonders...

Expand full comment

Austin had what many called a gender reassignment operation that went south, or a mental health issue due to a nervous breakdown, possible drugs or alcohol treatment, then again a stroke or heart attack.

Then again maybe it was his hemorrhoid's acting up.

Expand full comment

There had to be more people in on the secret. Walter Reed CO had to have reported up the medical chain that SecDef had checked in.

Expand full comment

Self licking ice cream cone. They reported up the medial chain of command to Austin.

Expand full comment
Jan 9·edited Jan 9

The Army Surgeon General would have known (and his sr. staff ) 10 seconds later) before he entered the door to the building.

Expand full comment

Is it possible that Austin, like most of the Biden cabinet, is an irrelevant figurehead and that the real decisions are made by unelected and unaccountable deep state SES and GS15 bureaucrats and their colleagues in the swamp? If so, then there was noi reason to bother the poor man while he was at Walter Reed. I am sure we all wish him a speedy recovery.

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 8·edited Jan 8

The dangerous, arrogant insularity of the DC NatSec crowd came to full flower in the Trump years.

As our Porch host is fond of doing, you can see how this has transpired in interpretive dance...

All the Keefers had vapors over mean tweets, went into action, and wrote distraught letters, made histrionic speeches, and stuff like fabricating fake dossiers to "Queeg" Trump..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KekChFdIe00

The open Disloyalty to Command was simply despicable.

Herman Wouk pegged how corrosive and dangerous such a disruption is...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw6gwGawbXA

What a sorry bunch.

Now we are here, where the DoD Establishment has forgotten who they actually work for...

And we are closer to this than most people realize:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ0rdbG2etQ

It won't be just the military. To your point, all of the DC Swamp critters are complicit. We've already seen the "3 letter" agencies engage in open sedition. Add the cubicle riders, the consultants, the industry Executives, the "I AM SCIENCE" megalomaniacs...

They all see the rest of, We The People, as lower class chattel.

Expand full comment

Great points.

You don't hear much from General Mattis, General Clapper or Admiral McRaven these days.

I guess they got their thirty pieces of silver.

Expand full comment

They'll be back to S$%tTalk the PotUS should those pesky people have the temerity and good fortune to put the Bad Orange Man back in office.

Expand full comment

I spent 40 years working for the Navy. One thing that was pounded into even the DOD Civil Service was subordination to elected authority. We didn't have to like or respect them (and I don't care what your politics are, over 40 years you WILL work for Presidents you love...and loathe). But we DID have to obey all lawful commands.

One of my personal icons is General Cornwallis. Yes, the one who surrendered at Yorktown. As LORD Cornwallis, he strongly disagreed with the British Government, thought the Americans were in the right. As GENERAL Cornwallis, he did his best to execute the policy set by his superiors. He was a professional. That's what professionals do.

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 8·edited Jan 8

Sad to say, this piece of work is the desired standard today...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Vindman#/media/File%3AAlexander_Vindman.png

Expand full comment

I wonder to whom he provided fellatio to get the CIB. He and his brother are commie shit stains.

Expand full comment

True. Lords Richard and William Howe were sympathetic to the American cause, as well. Duty reigns supreme. They took the King's shilling and conducted themselves as professionals.

Expand full comment

In keeping with precedents -- or are they traditions? -- established by the debacle of Kabul in 2021, our illustrious SecDef will retain his sinecure and paycheck:

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-isnt-considering-firing-austin-161844105.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

Expand full comment

Harvard needs a new president.

Expand full comment

There was a British comedy called Yes, MInister and a sequel Yes, Prime Minister in which a complete nonentity went from being a backbencher to a minor cabinet member to 10 Downing Street. His rise was made possible by high ranking knighted civil servants who really ran Great Britain and didn't want some politican interfering in the business of government. Now, life is imitating art.

Expand full comment

If only television produced anything half as witty as Yes, Minister these days.

Expand full comment
Jan 8Liked by CDR Salamander

Bryan McGrath was guest on Ward Carroll's channel live today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqND4Ny16xU

Expand full comment

Absolutely love Wards channel!!

Expand full comment

Have been a subscriber to that channel for a while and have the utmost respect for Ward Carroll. He did a balanced, fair video on Hultgreen a few years back. I was listening intently to the linked video and was gobsmacked again around 13:08. Got over it real quick after I replayed it and understood what was said in context. Getting gobsmacked, for me, can often just be a reflexive reaction. What was said at 13:08 was a nothingburger, and I only mention it to get ahead of possible unwarranted Leftist pushback.

Expand full comment
Jan 8·edited Jan 8

How is this much different than what happened with the "Afghanistan bail out" ... I'd call it par for the course with this administration.

Expand full comment

Chain of command. Used to actually mean something. Would Austin accept this from a COCOM? The answer is no. He is an odd duck anyways. Time to go. Likely suffering cardiac issues due to Covid vaccines and boosters.

Expand full comment

COCOM awareness was the most dangerous communication gap

Expand full comment

Actually, the utter break down in Nuclear Command and Control order of succession is the greatest and most dangerous gap.

This could not have happened unless Austin countermanded and ordered multiple personnel outside the SecDef office to conceal the fact. His protective detail is required to track his status and report to multiple inter-agency offices.

This is beyond fucked up.

Expand full comment

Austin would make a great president of Harvard.

Expand full comment

And amazingly, he forced all the DoD civilians and uniformed member to give up all their privacy so he could run his jab experiment on the population. Need the data for the experiments, dontcha know, and now they deny the data. They should all rot.

Expand full comment

Yep. Typical. Do as I say.

Expand full comment

He does not embody leadership by example.

Expand full comment

Hmm... Would this be the same Lloyd Austin chap who presided over a complete-total-draconian-procrustean-everyone/no exceptions program to... uh... "vaccinate" (with an experimental goop produced under TUA) everyone in the US military, plus civs, plus contractors? Over an ailment with .03% mortality rate, mostly among elderly and/or impaired immune systems? That Lloyd Austin? Whose medical "privacy" is soooo important?

Expand full comment
founding
Jan 8·edited Jan 8

Can't wait for Kirby to try and explain how this Goat Rope was just a routine Ops Normal event...

Expand full comment

Kirby is a classic example of a fuckknuckle.

Expand full comment

And in November, the choice will probably be between 2 candidates in worse shape than Austin...

Expand full comment

I'm betting there is a disturbing background to this.

Expand full comment

Excellent analysis, again, CDR Sal. I'd used a similar analogy...virtually any service would fire a CO for "loss of confidence" for something similar.

Even worse, Austin is #2 in the National Command Authority. #1 was out of CONUS on vacation. So brings to question, since he didn't tell her he was incapacitated who was taking charge as the NCA in the President's absence? Some 04 watch stander in the Pentagon NMCC?

Expand full comment

A newish Austin staffy was briefing the President when he, personally, found out about his boss.

Expand full comment

Everyone should resign after this shit show. In no organization, is this an appropriate behavior.

Expand full comment

No one resigns for poor performance anymore. But hopefully Secretary Austin will decide he needs more time with his grandkids.

Expand full comment

Biden should have resigned after the Hunter stuff, but Kamala is not compliant enough to take his place.

Probably something like that keeping some people in office.

Expand full comment

I had "Commit seppuku in disgrace" in mind, but resignation will be adequate.

Expand full comment

Conveniently not an option, cultural appropriation.

Expand full comment

Update: social media is now joking about making the Secretary an Honorary CWO2. Dark humor FTW.

Expand full comment