169 Comments

Doing the minimum to look like we're doing something, since solving the problem is going, ah "Full Saudi" (or Israeli).

Expand full comment

A US Army General gets it. Why can’t SecNav and CNO get it?

Expand full comment
Jul 23Edited

They are too preoccupied trying to look like Army Guys...

https://www.dvidshub.net/image/8535973/cno-mcpon-visit-officer-training-command-newport

Expand full comment

Maybe it’s the only way they can promote themselves as being martial. Heaven knows, they haven’t been doing their job as senior providers of the logistics required to fight a war. You know, ships, ordnance, etc. Camo for SEALs and CBs? Absolutely! Probably for aircrew in some scenarios as well. Most sailors? Dumb as a box of rocks.

Expand full comment

"A US Army General gets it."

Emphasize the "A". I am sure that somewhere there is also "A" Admiral that gets it. One down, a zillion to go.

Expand full comment

The Romans got it.

Expand full comment

The problem is one of will. The Israelis just showed what used to be the consequences, with a punitive raid on infrastructure. At this point, re-opening the Red Sea means ground raids.

Expand full comment

Or killing the leadership.

Expand full comment

Best way to do that is boots on the ground.

Expand full comment

It'd be an interesting experiment to try without boots on ground.

Expand full comment

If aerial bombardment worked, there would have been no need to invade Germany.

Expand full comment

Aerial bombardment caused Japan to give up...... EMBRACE THE POWER OF A THOUSAND SUNS!

Expand full comment

After they were under an increasingly effective submarine offensive, and mine blockade. The usual political factors mean nukes are off the table. And that is a Good Thing.

Expand full comment

Well, that and several years of defeats with massive casualties, and starvation.

Expand full comment

We didn't need to invade Japan either. We were starving them to death with airpower. Besides, we bought all those Small Diameter Bombs, they'd be perfect.

Expand full comment

But not long term. Some Arab nation needs to provide adult leadership.

Expand full comment

That didn't seem to work all that well in A'stan, and L Qaeda still seems to be a nuisance.

Expand full comment

To the best of my knowledge we never did that well after 2015 when we killed Mansoor.

Expand full comment

Just cut the water & power, the situation on the ground will solve itself.

Expand full comment

Million-dollar missiles to shoot down 100-dollar drones. Great plan.

Once again, with Dems in power, more proof that the US isn’t serious about warfare, or doesn’t have the backbone to wage it properly.

Expand full comment

RTX Stockholders approve of the "plan."

Expand full comment

So do our enemies...

Expand full comment

Israel accomplished more in their one strike then all the pentagon state department proportionality games over the last nine months.

Expand full comment

IDF achieved more press in one day, than years of Saudis doing the same.

Fireball pix are not the appropriate goal.

Expand full comment

The fireball got the attention but taking out the cranes used to offload missiles was likely more significant.

Expand full comment

Guess they don't know how a true leader dealt with pirates. Per the Britannica: "After 38 days, the ransom was delivered and Caesar went free [from the pirate's captivity]. Astonishingly, Caesar managed to raise a naval force in Miletus—despite holding no public or military office—and he set out in pursuit of the pirates. He found them still camped at the island where he had been held, and he brought them back as his captives. When the governor of Asia seemed to vacillate about punishing them, Caesar went to the prison where they were being held and had them all crucified."

Expand full comment

Gibbeting would work too AND feed the carrion eaters. Perhaps a new green industry could spring up around this environmentally friendly way of corpse disposal. Subsidized, of course.

Expand full comment

Ooh I like a good gibbet.

Expand full comment

That's "gibbets" not "giblets"! ;<)

But I do like a good giblet gravy over my cornbread stuffing.

Expand full comment

Oo-o. Gibbeting could produce some good Soylent Green jerky in the Middle East/Red Sea area. Totally green, no solar panels needed. Gaia can see no downside.

Expand full comment

The full story on that is even better than the Britannica version.

Expand full comment

Yes, indeed. I kept it short.

Expand full comment

And yet, Rome is gone but the pirates are still here.

Expand full comment

Obama likes Muslims therefore no real fighting allowed.

Americans die, Obama cheers.

Obama and the Democrats hate America and Americans.

Thus the importation of 10,000,000 20-30 year old African, Middle Eastern and Latin American men.

Expand full comment

It sounds like you've been in a coma for the last decade. Obama isn't in charge any more dude.

Expand full comment

Somebody is and it ain't Biden.

Expand full comment

Meanwhile, the Israelis take action which might possibly have a result. Amazed that our "Administration" didn't immediately call for a ceasefire.

Expand full comment

They’re too tied up figuring out whether or not we have a President…

Expand full comment

Looking at be last couple of days on our carnival, we lack an “administration”.

Expand full comment

pray that President Kameltoe will put the Miller Lite guy in as SECDEF

Expand full comment

I was thinking maybe the Bud Lite "guy/gal".

Expand full comment

U R correct: I picked the wrong beverage. Life is so complicated: I tried to watch a podcast last month of biden explaining Cold Fusion and could understand nothing of what he said.

Expand full comment

You could make the same comment about him explaining how to put on a pair socks.

Expand full comment
Jul 23Edited

How much of the impasse has to do with the Saudis not giving their acquiesence to a more powerful effort to shut the Houthis down?

We can't operate there for any length of time without their tacit support.

Expand full comment

“many people found the tone of [Kurilla’s] memo to be a bit shocking,” suggesting it effectively warned that “U.S. service members will die if we continue going this way.”

Who are these Many People(TM)?

Expand full comment

They're the same ones who appear elsewhere as "critics" or "some observers," depending on context.

Expand full comment

Shocking...for this administration.

The White House and Nat'l Security group is so used to the brass in uniform nodding their heads and not being forceful in their position, that when a COCOM does take up a position, they don't know what to do.

Expand full comment

They learned by watching Harris.

Expand full comment

Huh, an accurate assessment of combat situations is shocking? If you are shocked, you shouldn't be in charge as you have no understanding. That doesn't mean you have to have served, just that you have either failed to seek understanding or are incapable of it.

Expand full comment

We surely don't want to break anything lest we come to own it.

Can't remember where I heard that one...a different General perhaps?

Expand full comment

And as I recall, the good general did not attach the chapter & verse that placed that obligation on the U.S. when he said it.

Expand full comment

Remembering Erik Kurilla's story in Michael Yon's reporting from the urban battles in Iraq- Yon's photo of then-LTC Kurilla getting hit three times in the leg, shattering the femur, and still firing his M4 dry into a building where the bad guys were.

This guy is the real deal. Good to know we have someone like that upstairs.

Expand full comment
Jul 23Edited

Had never heard of this before...

Bad Ass!!

https://www.usstopekaclg8.org/Mail/Iraq/LTC_Kurilla/LTC_Kurilla.htm

Expand full comment

Holy shit. I had never seen that.

Expand full comment

Wow!

Expand full comment

great story.

Expand full comment

I thought the name sounded familiar! Truly bad ass, and he is telling "higher" something they need to hear, but will not like. Long overdue.

But, keep Kurilla's name on your list of future top army brass instead of the perfumed princes/princesses making bad decisions at the top now.

Expand full comment

Michael Yon later soured on Erik Kurilla for meekly submitting to the vaccine mandates. https://michaelyon.locals.com/post/4743736/the-hardest-post-i-have-had-to-write

Expand full comment

Damn.

Expand full comment

George Washington ordered the first vaccine mandate and it won the revolution. "Finding the smallpox to be spreading much and fearing that no precaution can prevent it from running thro’ the whole of our Army, I have determined that the Troops shall be inoculated. This Expedient may be attended with some inconveniences and some disadvantages, but yet I trust, in its consequences will have the most happy effects. Necessity not only authorizes but seems to require the measure, for should the disorder infect the Army, in the natural way, and rage with its usual Virulence, we should have more to dread from it, than from the sword of the enemy." George Washington to William Shippen, Jr., February 6, 1777.

Expand full comment

You have a Marine Amphibious Group in the Red Sea that can land a Reinforced USMC Battalion in Houthi-land in a matter of hours. Use it to temporarily occupy objectives, destroy communications and weapons deployment/storage infrastructure, and leave. Establish a weapons quarantine on Yemen. The Saudis will be willing to assist with the interdiction of the land routes.

Let the IDF use their assets to decapitate the Houthi Political and Military leadership.

Time to swat the 4th World Gnat once and for all.

Expand full comment

If we don't have one already, we can have an SSBN within launch range of Yemen in a day or two at the most.

Why get fancy?

Expand full comment

The IDF gets it, They destroyed targets (ports and materiel handling equipment/cranes) that enable the Houthis to receive the drones from Iran.

We (U.S.) go after individual launching platforms.

We are not serious.

Expand full comment

Evidently you missed the Korean War. I was in grade school then, but I can remember the controversy over the "privileged sanctuary" the enemy enjoyed north of the Yalu River, where their air force was based and all their supplies came from.

Expand full comment

Concern about widening that war (Kim il-Sung, remember, was with the Soviets during WWII and had their permission to head south; and the Chinese Communists had consolidated their control just before the Korean War--with battle-tested troops) was a real thing.

Expand full comment

Huh? Their sanctuary north of the Yalu lasted for years after the Chinese had already entered the war in a big way.

Expand full comment

There was a back-channel threat that the Soviets would give their Chinese comrades nukes if we hit China.

Expand full comment

There were soviet pilots flying those MiGs in Korea, too.

Expand full comment

More a bipartisan way of war.

Expand full comment

No.

Democrat.

In 1972, Nixon authorized the kind of air campaign that could have happened 7 years before.

And, the original strategic objective...compelling the North Vietnamese to negotiate...happened in a matter of weeks.

Expand full comment

Nixon was first elected in 1968. What happened between 1968 and 1972?

Expand full comment
Jul 31Edited

the bombing halt mostly...there was no sustained bombing effort again until 1972.

Johnson ended the Rolling Thunder campaign in April (may have the month wrong...but certainly before midsummer).

[edit] Johnson first halted (not the first halt in the whole campaign, as there were numerous ones from 1965 on) ops on March 31 1968 north of the 20th parallel. The full halt came on Oct. 31 1968...

https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/196022/sanctuaries-and-bombing-halts/

After that the only sustained offensive bombing in the North were the "Protective Reaction" strikes in 1970.

and another source...

https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/01/2001309673/-1/-1/0/ToHanoiAndBack.pdf

lastly...fascinating but chilling...to watch this recreation...

(Red Crown was on busy dude!...And the lost F-4's he was contending with adds some levity)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60ihI7VU2OY

Expand full comment

"there was no sustained bombing effort again until 1972."

Exactly. Bipartisan.

Expand full comment

As you say, Sal...We (the US, and to a far lesser extent, Europe) is playing. The only people fighting are the barbarians, and Israel.

Get back to me when we're going full Israel on the barbarians: Then we will be fighting.

Expand full comment

Russia? Iran?

Expand full comment

I'm not too worried about Russia. Iran? Better we fight them before they become a nuclear power (if they haven't already). If they want to chance it.

Expand full comment

Curious as to what you think of some sort of Turkish intervention?

Expand full comment

I think that would be an excellent way for Turkey to get kicked out of NATO, and then have their control of the Bosporus, the Dardanelles, and the Sea of Marmara wrenched away from them, with extreme prejudice. Can't have a mad dog in control of significant seaways like that. And Russia would be happy to see their free access to the Black Sea.

That would also result in a loss of their presence in Cyprus, and likely an incursion from Iran and Syria, at least in small measure. Winners would be Greece, Russia, Bulgaria, and the rest of the world. Russia's benefit would be a detriment to Ukraine, at least in theory - but I'm not sure that Russia has a lot of slack to send to the Black Sea

Expand full comment

Doubt Turkey has the force projection capability to deal with the Houthis. They're adequately busy in Northwestern Syria these days...

Expand full comment

Agreed. They are the head of the snake. Have been for a long time. Iran should not be ignored when dealing with Hamas/Houthis...

Once they finish in Gaza, maybe Israel will turn to them since we seemingly won't...

Expand full comment