Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EPF Guy's avatar

Having recently retired after 22 years with MSC preceded by 24 years of active duty Navy I humbly disagree with the below comment by Jhon D'oh regarding the competence of MSC crews. That being said MSC is bleeding personnel every bit as much (maybe more) than the Navy. My last nine years were in the EPF community and I have sailed many of the ships that will be "laid up". MSC will not gain many people as most of these ships were undermanned and some are sharing crew depending on employment of the vessel. Captains and most of the crew are being pulled off ships when they are in the yards or in a non-active status of any type.

For clarification purposes, on blended crew ships, i.e. Lewis B Puller and Herschel "Woody" WIlliams, MSC operates the ship will USN personnel perform the mission. That means civilians are running Deck, Engine, Supply and a portion of Communications Department on those vessels.

Mike Brogley's avatar

I though the expeditionary sea base ships, even after they were moved to USS status, were still mixed crew, civilian contractors and Navy, to save active duty billets. The official USN page on them says crew is “44 Military Sealift Command personnel” and ”101 military”.

So they are going to mothball those two Puller-class ships in order to save 202 billets? Holy recruiting shortfall Batman, how short are they? And what will they send in their place, America-class baby-CVs and their crew of 1,200?

23 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?