62 Comments

Standard English Pronouns are the only ones Badgers know.

Expand full comment

"Ya, ya, Frithrah StBADGER, dese pornouns ese so zorn of Aengleese to speek anow. Like it vair hraka tekkin steppe tru Watership Down after trod by many so loose bowel lendri and other embleer elil for we rabbit of bare hare feet." - Captain Holly (late of the Owslafa)

^ Xi asked moi to pass that along. I think our best bet is to medically retire and pension off those who get a chronic ass-rash from micro-aggressive misgendering pronouns. Or pornouns as Capt. Holly puts it.

Expand full comment

This pronoun business is beyond pathetic.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by CDR Salamander

No it's not, it is essential to their goals.

"The party controls external reality through the control of the mind, and it controls the mind, through the control of language." Orwell, 1984.

Expand full comment

See User Name

Expand full comment

".... and in the course of the Coastguardian's duties, this Coastguardian went above the call of duty...". That's what award citations will sound like?

And did I give them a stupid idea that will be adopted?

Expand full comment

Xe/xir certainly can't refer to "the member." Too phallic.

Expand full comment

Gender neutrality is a waste of brainpower. First, you must know what you want to say. But then, you must also mentally reprocess the words and meaning in a way such that you say it without using vast swaths of traditional English language, including root words and grammatical constructs with origins in ancient Latin and Greek. So in essence, with gender neutrality you're verbally handicapping yourself. When you analyze it that way, gender neutrality is a sign of enforced ignorance. Which is another way of saying that policymakers who demand gender neutrality are ignorant bullies.

Expand full comment

The problem is you don't always know who your audience is. So if you say, "he lost the plot," you run the risk of offending someone you are attempting to persuade. It's much simpler to go along than to fight, which is, of course part of the problem. I'm all for gay rights, love the gays, but when they force us into mental gymnastics, they've lost the plot.

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by CDR Salamander

how 'bout we all (ALL!) just go back to a classic:

"Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never harm me."

Expand full comment

Appoint a woke Commandant, get a woke Coast Guard.

Expand full comment

Found this prescription (Rx) via Sal’s h/t Alex-URL:

https://twitter.com/populistical/status/1650857141970915330?s=61

Expand full comment

The current Commandant was confirmed by unanimous consent on 11 May 2022 by the Senate. Not saying any of this is her fault. But it sounds like a team effort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_L._Fagan

Expand full comment

The flag & SES corps are infested with wokesters and cowards. You're absolutely correct.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 1, 2023Liked by CDR Salamander

Interesting perspective from a gay Marine who now works for the Chicago Police Department...

https://www.chicagocontrarian.com/blog/death-of-chicagos-gayborhood-crime-property-value-tax-boystown

"A city without a thriving LGB community simply does not count as a city (we’ll hold the “T” thank you very much – as do the silent majority of LGB community members who know this is an Icarus-level narcissistic affront to the very existence of being gay or lesbian, let alone being human)."

Expand full comment

They have the city they voted for.

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 1, 2023·edited Jun 1, 2023

We -all- have that city...

What's happening here, and LA, and in NYC, etc. , will have impacts across the entire country.

The LGBQT movement is no different than the Jacobins.

May be just some yawner tv clips right now, but just wait.

Expand full comment

It's already happening to some extent in Fort Worth. But, thus far local conditions are a still a somewhat tempering influence in the areas being gentrified by the new LGBQT crowd escaping the big cities. (Fortunately my local watering hole has been off the radar of the transplants.)

Expand full comment

I don't understand what this means.

You can't use phrases like

"Her heroic actions were a credit . . "

"His knowledge of systems is an asset . . "

???

Expand full comment
Jun 1, 2023Liked by CDR Salamander

I'm thinking the incoming Spanish speakers may just put a halt to that.

Expand full comment

Why?

Expand full comment

Because the romance languages are gendered. When we play football, we bring the very feminine soccer ball, "la pelota." But, to get to the field, we ride the masculine train, "el tren." The nouns have gender.

So do the people. If our coach is a woman she is la entrenadora, but if Pep is coaching he is el entrenador.

Expand full comment

So the US will become a Spanish speaking country? Aren't the Spanish, French, Italian languages under the same "gender neutral" siege?

Expand full comment

Become? Here in the land of flowers we've been speaking Spanish since 1565.

Expand full comment

You're dodging the question. What is it about Spanish speakers that will put a halt to "that" as Bear claims?

Expand full comment

OK here we go.

Senora notice the A? That is the feminine.

Senor. That is the Male.

Chico, notice the O that is male.

Chica, Notice the A that is feminine.

They will speak Spanish and they will not change the O, or A that denotes sex/gender.

The name picked by liberal leftists even those Latino/Hispanics is "Latinx" and it is hated by the Latino/Latina (notice the O and A?)

They will ignore the pronoun guerillas.

Expand full comment

I think so. It would be what is known as Tex-Mex a polyglot of Spanish and English with Spanish becoming the predominant language of the US.

We are fast becoming Bi-Lingual.

All by design of the democrat, The republican and the libertarian. Population replacement.

The La Raza are going to move into the nation which if they have their way will be named Atzlan, as it is now they call America La Frontera. Which means the border or The Frontier.

My Grandsons can already converse with Mexican and other Latino/Hispanics in Spanish I have even learned a lot of Spanish.

Of course now I am no expert. Just an observation.

Expand full comment

Central and South America are huge markets for American goods, film and TV. Miami is one of the great cities of the world. The safety of our dollar, the security of our banks and the ability to own real property have made Miami the financial capital of the southern hemisphere. For kids fluent in Spanish and English the world is their oyster. Bienvenido a florida. (Or, if you are a lady, Bienvenida.)

Expand full comment

Because, like the speakers of most Romance Languages, to them every word has a gender. It's a sensibility they may retain, like Slavs forgetting prepositions.

Expand full comment

That's what Tom Yardley said and I refuted because Romance languages are under the same "gender neutral" siege.

Say something else.

Expand full comment

Spanish speakers will ignore the siege and keep on keeping on.

France colonized Mexico, but the Mexican's refused to speak French same with the German's and the Americano. These people are traditionalist they simply won't and you can't make them. These folks are more conservatives and smarter than that.

It simply won't happen has not happened yet.

Learn Spanish. It will help to dispel the Pronoun weenies plans.

Expand full comment

That wasn't a refutation. Contradiction is not a reasoned argument.

The Bear succinctly explained how deeply gendered the romance languages are, and why the "siege" will be quickly drowned in the moats of the castles of Castile.

This gender nonsense is going to pass, it's a just a fad. Too complicated to last. It will fade out soon, and the right wing culture warriors will be off chasing the next woke squirrel.

Expand full comment

OK so the consensus seems to be that romantic languages have built in gender references that are almost insurmountable.

Not clear how that helps an English speaking country.

Expand full comment

Yeah, I'm not understanding what the bromance languages have to do with any of this.

Expand full comment

Bravo! (The reference to the "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" was a great (and apt) touch.)

Expand full comment

While the official usage nonsense is disturbing, actually interacting with service members on a daily basis (across the spectrum of US services) indicates it is more or less being ignored in practice. Which is probably a good thing. Nor have I ever experienced a complaint about traditional usage.

Expand full comment

take off and nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure!

Expand full comment
founding

Unfortunately, the USCG has been becoming wokish for a while. I believe it started when they went to their light blue uniforms so as to be distinguished from the war mongering Navy more easily.

Expand full comment

I was always opposed to uniform changes because they were a PITA. The uniform allowance never covered the cost. Let's make an exception, Flag rank of all Services to switch to a unisex sack cloth muumuu made of burlap and horse hair.

Expand full comment
founding

Great idea. They kinda did it back during the "Flight suit is a real uniform" days, I think.

Expand full comment

Nowadays they wear camouflaged hunting gear in the CIC, so the flight suit seems like a real uniform.

Expand full comment

In my CIC days it was starched and crisply press dungarees and wash khakis. Gah! I can still feel it...getting up in the early A.M. and sticking my legs, one at a time, down that starched trouser leg hole. Oh yeah. Worse mistake I ever made was when I bought 5 sets of tailored gaberdine khakis when I made Chief. What a great uniform that was with the brown shoes (no I wasn't an Aviator), tan socks and black tie. Nobody told me I'd outgrow size 32 trousers in just 3-4 months of eating in the Chief's Mess. Went up to size 36 muy rápida.

Expand full comment

Ugh... I remember the Olden Days. I walked into the Pentagon one time in my crisp and well-tailored SDBs... And walked past this USAF area in which everyone was wearing zoom-bags. With not an aircraft in sight. Oh, they were so proud of their zoom-bags. I think they even starched them (insider joke there, for anyone who never wore the nomex drab).

Expand full comment

In 1989 I was with my LCPO visiting one of our Chiefs in the hospital at Eglin AFB. The Senior Chief and I were in Dress Blues, tooling along shooting the breeze and saw some bum looking guy in overalls and a ballcap crawl out of a dumpster. Then we heard a "HOLD UP THERE!" from behind us. That bum was a crusty old USAF Major in a poopy suit . I reckoned then that he was something like Deck Division Officer. Never saw any sign of rank until he started yelling. But too late. He laid into me and the Senior Chief and berated us and our Navy for being unprofessional, unmilitary, and discourteous. I was a LT, so I put on my guilty face, made no excuses, saluted him and let him sputter to an end. Afterward, I asked the Senior Chief how he rated the ass chewing. He said, "The Navy does it better, Lieutenant." I thanked him. It kind of lightened the mood.

Expand full comment

The famous "Poopy suit."

Expand full comment
founding

Indeed. They are comfortable, practical etc. But as a uniform---definitely poopy.

Expand full comment

UNISEX? Sounds like a peacekeeping deployment....

Expand full comment

you have to wonder if the CCP is worried about pronouns in their military,, appears DoD/DHS is loosing focus on the real issue and competitor..

Expand full comment

A lost campaign CDR.

Best now to develop and sell S/W that will automatically convert FITREPS, Letters, other awards, and bullets into gender neutral miltarese. - At least try and make a buck out of it.

Expand full comment

Sadly, I would imagine ChatGPT is already writing 20% of them

Expand full comment

We are offended (The Royal We). My head is spinning with all of this nonsense. What kind of cuckoo's nest are we living in?

Expand full comment